Sette Budini wrote:Hi BV'ers, long time no post...
I had a "discussion" with an acquaintance (read: moron) today with whom I'm afraid I will need to continue to maintain an association.
The acquaintance is one of those who believe cycling is inherently dangerous, we are under regulated with not nearly enough mandated compulsory safety things (his example was compulsory fluoro tabards), and we don't pay for the roads.
My only reply will be to email him the "facts".
To save me from doing my own research, I just know you guys will probably have good articles on the following things bookmarked:
- the link between perceived danger and lower cyclist numbers
- lower cyclist numbers link to lower safety
- the old who/what pays for road infrastructure fallacy.
Help out a sister so I can spend more time riding and less time talking to morons!
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 13 guests