Marx wrote:I didn’t want to say that women were essentially non-aggressive, more that providing cycling infrastructure which didn’t benefit an aggressive approach to cycling would be an incentive for women to ride.
Perhaps this isn’t possible everywhere, but maybe doable to key routes/locations, & this would then provide a kick-on influence for women to ride elsewhere later on as riding becomes a more frequent activity in their lives.
cold_erin wrote:Marx wrote:Could I hazard that the need to be assertive while cycling in Melbourne, would be a disincentive for women more so than men? Or am I being sexist?
Perhaps constructs like Copen lanes & off-the-road shared paths is a positive, as it presents the riders with an environment where larger more threatening users like cars & cement mixers aren’t to be contended with.Marx wrote:I didn’t want to say that women were essentially non-aggressive, more that providing cycling infrastructure which didn’t benefit an aggressive approach to cycling would be an incentive for women to ride.
Perhaps this isn’t possible everywhere, but maybe doable to key routes/locations, & this would then provide a kick-on influence for women to ride elsewhere later on as riding becomes a more frequent activity in their lives.
cold_erin wrote:cold_erin wrote:Marx wrote:Could I hazard that the need to be assertive while cycling in Melbourne, would be a disincentive for women more so than men? Or am I being sexist?
Perhaps constructs like Copen lanes & off-the-road shared paths is a positive, as it presents the riders with an environment where larger more threatening users like cars & cement mixers aren’t to be contended with.Marx wrote:I didn’t want to say that women were essentially non-aggressive, more that providing cycling infrastructure which didn’t benefit an aggressive approach to cycling would be an incentive for women to ride.
Perhaps this isn’t possible everywhere, but maybe doable to key routes/locations, & this would then provide a kick-on influence for women to ride elsewhere later on as riding becomes a more frequent activity in their lives.
I believe that providing off-road/separated infrastructure for bikes would benefit everybody - male, female or other. I know that on these forums, I hear about vehicular cycling a lot and while this has some benefits, treating bicycles as the separate vehicle they are would increase cycling and cyclist confidence.
I don't think there's anything gender specific about cycling infrastructure (except if they're cobbled, of course, in which case female user smay be in the majority...)
Percrime wrote:Had a girl tell me last night that she was the only masters 1 woman racing track at Blackburn. Masters 1 is like 32. Whats with that? Girls come and play on the track damnit.
Percrime wrote:Had a girl tell me last night that she was the only masters 1 woman racing track at Blackburn. Masters 1 is like 32. Whats with that? Girls come and play on the track damnit.
The Duckmeister wrote:Percrime wrote:Had a girl tell me last night that she was the only masters 1 woman racing track at Blackburn. Masters 1 is like 32. Whats with that? Girls come and play on the track damnit.
Maybe it's something about the term "Masters" implying getting old. And 30-something women generally are the most anxious about the perception of getting old.
The Duckmeister wrote:Maybe it's something about the term "Masters" implying getting old. And 30-something women generally are the most anxious about the perception of getting old.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest